Search:   
Home    Search    Invite    Help Signup    Login


Bush to veto bill banning waterboarding
8:04 PM on Mar. 7, 2008

I wanted to share something that I just read.  I guess some people in this word do not care about what is right and what is wrong. Some just lives by their own rules regardless what society rules are.... of course I am talking about Bush. Read this from the Associate Press that was just realeased......


Bush to veto bill banning waterboarding

The White House says President Bush will veto legislation on Saturday that would have barred the CIA from using waterboarding — a technique that simulates drowning — and other harsh interrogation methods on terror suspects.

Bush has said the bill would harm the government's ability to prevent future attacks. Supporters of the legislation argue that it preserves the United States' right to collect critical intelligence while boosting the country's moral standing abroad.

"The bill would take away one of the most valuable tools on the war on terror, the CIA program to detain and question key terrorist leaders and operatives," deputy White House press secretary Tony Fratto said Friday.

The bill would restrict the CIA to using only the 19 interrogation techniques listed in the Army field manual.

The legislation would bar the CIA from using waterboarding, sensory deprivation or other coercive methods to break a prisoner who refuses to answer questions. Those practices were banned by the military in 2006, but the president wants the harsh interrogation methods to be a part of the CIA's toolbox.

Backers of the legislation, which cleared the House in December and won Senate approval last month, say the interrogation methods used by the military are sufficient.

"President Bush's veto will be one of the most shameful acts of his presidency," Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said in a statement Friday. "Unless Congress overrides the veto, it will go down in history as a flagrant insult to the rule of law and a serious stain on the good name of America in the eyes of the world."

He noted that the Army field manual contends that harsh interrogation is a "poor technique that yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say what he thinks the (interrogator) wants to hear."

from the Associated Press.

 

 


Comments (2)
Anonymous - 3:46 PM on Sep. 11, 2008  [ message ]
I know during war the difference between being a bad guy or a good guy is a fine line, but the reality is there are times when drastic times call for drastic measures. I'm not saying I like the idea of torturing someone, but if it's a choice between my side winning versus theirs then I'm all for it. Sorry that I sound inhumane but there are people out there who are just as cruel if not worse. At least we don't show video of people being beheaded.
musiclover - 7:46 PM on Mar. 10, 2008  [ message ]
I guess I would like to know what other "valuable tools" this bill would take away from the CIA "program to detain and question key terrorist leaders and operatives." Obviously, the press has picked up on the water boarding thing and they are pointing out more negative things about Bush to the public. Perhaps there is something else in the bill (besides waterboarding) that caused Bush to veto it?
Also, after reading the quote by Ted Kennedy I am reminded how much I dislike the man. Driving drunk one night into a river with a woman passenger, saving himself and not reporting the incident until the next morning. You're right, ypublishing, I guess some people don't care about what is right and wrong.